<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for reneestephen.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reneestephen.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reneestephen.com</link>
	<description>Proud and strange and so hopelessly hopeful.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 21:40:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Comment on UBC by Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.reneestephen.com/2010/07/ubc/comment-page-1/#comment-3573</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 21:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reneestephen.com/?p=530#comment-3573</guid>
		<description>I think you absolutely nailed what&#039;s wrong with the standards (and why).

I don&#039;t think I agree that boring is better than stupid.  At least stupid stands out and can be memorable -- at least, that&#039;s been my experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you absolutely nailed what&#8217;s wrong with the standards (and why).</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think I agree that boring is better than stupid.  At least stupid stands out and can be memorable &#8212; at least, that&#8217;s been my experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on UBC by Renee</title>
		<link>http://www.reneestephen.com/2010/07/ubc/comment-page-1/#comment-3572</link>
		<dc:creator>Renee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 07:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reneestephen.com/?p=530#comment-3572</guid>
		<description>Hey, yeah! And &lt;em&gt;Tuum est&lt;/em&gt; also translates to &quot;It&#039;s up to you&quot;. It&#039;s so great it has &lt;em&gt;two &lt;/em&gt;meanings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, yeah! And <em>Tuum est</em> also translates to &#8220;It&#8217;s up to you&#8221;. It&#8217;s so great it has <em>two </em>meanings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on UBC by Evan</title>
		<link>http://www.reneestephen.com/2010/07/ubc/comment-page-1/#comment-3571</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 06:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reneestephen.com/?p=530#comment-3571</guid>
		<description>UBC&#039;s entire re-branding is a disaster. The colour scheme is hideous, the layout of the new ubc.ca front page is horrid and the new motto is rancid. What exactly was wrong with the official UBC motto which they have used since inception, the Latin phrase &quot;Tuum est&quot; which translates to &quot;It Is Yours&quot;.

The new branding effor makes me literally embarrassed to work at UBC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UBC&#8217;s entire re-branding is a disaster. The colour scheme is hideous, the layout of the new ubc.ca front page is horrid and the new motto is rancid. What exactly was wrong with the official UBC motto which they have used since inception, the Latin phrase &#8220;Tuum est&#8221; which translates to &#8220;It Is Yours&#8221;.</p>
<p>The new branding effor makes me literally embarrassed to work at UBC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on UBC by gillian</title>
		<link>http://www.reneestephen.com/2010/07/ubc/comment-page-1/#comment-3569</link>
		<dc:creator>gillian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 04:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reneestephen.com/?p=530#comment-3569</guid>
		<description>Bitch all you want, but I was there during the Martha Piper years and the &quot;Think About It&quot; branding which IMHO was far, far worse than this. I recall she commissioned a composer to create a choral work around that theme, even. Blech.

At least this one isn&#039;t stupid. Boring is better than stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bitch all you want, but I was there during the Martha Piper years and the &#8220;Think About It&#8221; branding which IMHO was far, far worse than this. I recall she commissioned a composer to create a choral work around that theme, even. Blech.</p>
<p>At least this one isn&#8217;t stupid. Boring is better than stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on UBC by Renee</title>
		<link>http://www.reneestephen.com/2010/07/ubc/comment-page-1/#comment-3568</link>
		<dc:creator>Renee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 19:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reneestephen.com/?p=530#comment-3568</guid>
		<description>The &quot;brown doesn&#039;t go with blue&quot; rule is new on me, but sure, the Place of Mind site isn&#039;t perfect. It&#039;s just &lt;em&gt;waaay better&lt;/em&gt;.

I definitely think UBC should adopt your slogan. I&#039;ll bet we&#039;d get a lot of press for being honest...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;brown doesn&#8217;t go with blue&#8221; rule is new on me, but sure, the Place of Mind site isn&#8217;t perfect. It&#8217;s just <em>waaay better</em>.</p>
<p>I definitely think UBC should adopt your slogan. I&#8217;ll bet we&#8217;d get a lot of press for being honest&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on UBC by Minor Mogul</title>
		<link>http://www.reneestephen.com/2010/07/ubc/comment-page-1/#comment-3567</link>
		<dc:creator>Minor Mogul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 19:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reneestephen.com/?p=530#comment-3567</guid>
		<description>You can&#039;t expect the place to use these &quot;colours&quot; you speak of, and abandon the installed user-base of monochrome monitors, can you?

And brown doesn&#039;t go with blue -- or at least, that brown doesn&#039;t go with that blue. But if you do want to use colours, what&#039;s wrong with ... oh ... red? -- a very popular colour, I&#039;m led to understand. The green on &quot;Eating green&quot; is nice and vibrant, but seems out of place on the rest of the drab page.

&quot;A place of mind&quot; is kinda cute. Perhaps you&#039;re letting your Phoolosophy background distract you with &quot;theories of mind&quot; and stuff. It sounds better than &quot;Your last chance to study something you&#039;re actually interested in before you enter a depressed employment market and have to take a job, any job, to put food on the table.&quot;

Verdict: dull, but not offensive. Perhaps &quot;drab&quot; is the word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can&#8217;t expect the place to use these &#8220;colours&#8221; you speak of, and abandon the installed user-base of monochrome monitors, can you?</p>
<p>And brown doesn&#8217;t go with blue &#8212; or at least, that brown doesn&#8217;t go with that blue. But if you do want to use colours, what&#8217;s wrong with &#8230; oh &#8230; red? &#8212; a very popular colour, I&#8217;m led to understand. The green on &#8220;Eating green&#8221; is nice and vibrant, but seems out of place on the rest of the drab page.</p>
<p>&#8220;A place of mind&#8221; is kinda cute. Perhaps you&#8217;re letting your Phoolosophy background distract you with &#8220;theories of mind&#8221; and stuff. It sounds better than &#8220;Your last chance to study something you&#8217;re actually interested in before you enter a depressed employment market and have to take a job, any job, to put food on the table.&#8221;</p>
<p>Verdict: dull, but not offensive. Perhaps &#8220;drab&#8221; is the word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on tread by Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.reneestephen.com/2010/07/tread/comment-page-1/#comment-3553</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 11:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reneestephen.com/?p=518#comment-3553</guid>
		<description>Have you ever read &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Long_Walk&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Long Walk&lt;/a&gt; by Stephen King, great book!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever read <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Long_Walk" rel="nofollow">The Long Walk</a> by Stephen King, great book!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on tread by Randy Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.reneestephen.com/2010/07/tread/comment-page-1/#comment-3550</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 02:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reneestephen.com/?p=518#comment-3550</guid>
		<description>Yo dogg you need to finish yo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yo dogg you need to finish yo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on tread by Renee</title>
		<link>http://www.reneestephen.com/2010/07/tread/comment-page-1/#comment-3544</link>
		<dc:creator>Renee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 21:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reneestephen.com/?p=518#comment-3544</guid>
		<description>Only if you promise to give me a ceremonial ogle. And perhaps a wolf-whistle or two; but that&#039;s not essential.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only if you promise to give me a ceremonial ogle. And perhaps a wolf-whistle or two; but that&#8217;s not essential.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on tread by Catherine</title>
		<link>http://www.reneestephen.com/2010/07/tread/comment-page-1/#comment-3540</link>
		<dc:creator>Catherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reneestephen.com/?p=518#comment-3540</guid>
		<description>Gams, you say? Let&#039;s do coffee. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gams, you say? Let&#8217;s do coffee. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
